“It’s very hard to make these tools identifying content, because they can’t identify context, and so they make decisions that are likely to be bad,” says Jim Killock at the Open Rights Group, a UK digital rights campaign group. Users would risk having their content removed by overzealous bots. Saveyourinternet.eu has a great tool for finding and contacting your MEP, and has a few prewritten scripts and talking points for them. Phone calls are generally the most effective method, since you know they actually answer them. If you've been lurking around the internet recently, you may have seen a lot of drama about this "Article 13" in the EU going around. Since most of the other sites are political action groups that want your money, and many others do a garbage job of explaining this, I'll try to explain this as briefly and simply as possible.

What is Article 13? We explain the EU's new copyright law

• Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.
• Combs said he was willing to meet, but after Mescudi reconsidered “the gravity of the situation,” he decided against it.
• “It doesn’t really matter if people at the bottom are getting relatively small tax cuts if they're losing their health care, they're losing their SNAP benefits and they're having to pay more money in tariffs,” Gimbel said.
• YouTube's current Content ID gives copyright owners the right to claim ownership of content already live on YouTube.
• If the AI is good enough to work out the difference between a meme and thieving copyrighted material, Article 13 could work.

In a second blog post on November 12 she said there were "unintended consequences" of Article 13. "The parliament’s approach is unrealistic in many cases because copyright owners often disagree over who owns what rights," she wrote. how to trade oil "If the owners cannot agree, it is impossible to expect the open platforms that host this content to make the correct rights decisions."

The legislation includes a measure to create a tax deduction of up to $25,000 for cash tips for eligible employees working in the food, drink and beauty industries. While U.S. households would be aided by smaller tax cuts, the bill is “tilted toward rich Americans,” Martha Gimbel, executive director and co-founder of the Yale Budget Lab, told USA Today. If you don’t want to do the work yourself, you can contact an independent insurance agent.

More sample car insurance rates

Certain services are exempted, including non-profit encyclopaedias like Wikipedia, software development platforms like Github, and cloud storage services. This already exists at some scale with YouTube, which has a neural network identify copyrighted works such as TV shows and music. We've seen how that works out- frequent errors in judgement with long response times from a company whose business thrives on having content. Imagine how much worse the situation would be if the government ran it, having little-to-no incentive to work to allow incorrectly flagged content.

Why is Article 13 controversial?

That management would then be able to order YouTube to take down or modify the video at their discretion. Article 13 is just a small part of the entire directive, but it’s controversial because it states that content sharing platforms must ensure that “unauthorised protected works” are not available on their platforms. The EU’s solution for this is to pass a law,The European Union Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market, of which Article 13 is a small part. Essentially, the directive proposes that content sharing platforms and aggregators like YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Twitch, etc. be made liable for any copyright infringement that happens on their respective platforms.

• Saveyourinternet.eu has a great tool for finding and contacting your MEP, and has a few prewritten scripts and talking points for them.
• We've seen how that works out- frequent errors in judgement with long response times from a company whose business thrives on having content.
• Kaplan also recalled an incident at Combs' Miami house where the rapper "threw a bunch of green apples" at model Gina Huynh.
• That’s because each insurer uniquely calculates car insurance rates using many personal factors, like your age, marital status and driving history.

Will Article 13 affect video game streamers?

To a computer, all of the images probably look reasonably similar, therefore it might just block all of them. There's also the question of gaming footage that's uploaded to services such as Twitch. For content creators, rather than helping, this is more than a massive headache and could directly impact their ability to monetise their content.

Proponents of the Directive on Copyright argue that this means that people are listening to, watching and reading copyrighted material without the creators being properly paid for it. Rightsholders say that the rules will put an end to the days of pirating music and video online, and ensure artists receive a fair payment for their work. Supporters of the directive include musicians Debbie Harry and Paul McCartney. Article 13 no longer exists — in its current form as Article 17, it’s much less contentious and makes exceptions for users to post content like memes, parodies, criticisms, and reviews. In psychological marketing examples a humorous twist, some users created memes about the possible ban on memes, like the hand-drawn version of a popular Drake meme pictured below, originally posted on Reddit by user Yamezj.

However, if the legislation passes all websites where users upload content would have to implement the same technologies. Critics argue that the law doesn’t achieve its purpose, that it will kill smaller content sharing platforms and creators and encourage censorship for fear of legal repercussions. Users say the rules risk killing off vibrant internet culture, such as memes, which often repurpose unlicensed material. And the legal status of streamers, who post videos of themselves playing video games online, is in question. Start by reading NerdWallet’s analysis of the cheapest car insurance, and then compare rates online from companies that offer the cheapest rates in your state.

The European Copyright Directive has been years in the making, and on Tuesday, March 26, the European Parliament is due to vote on the final version of it. While those are the negatives, there’s every chance that internet users might not notice these changes at all. That would make it more difficult and costly to create new code from scratch. The concern is that because Article 13 mandates the use of artificial intelligence and filtering technologies, those technologies are not advanced enough to pick up the nuances in content like memes.

This conflict of interest affects our ability to provide you with unbiased, objective information about the services of Atomic Invest. This could mean that the services of another investment adviser with whom we are not engaged could be more appropriate for you than Atomic Invest. Advisory services through Atomic Invest are designed to assist clients in achieving a favorable outcome in their investment portfolio. They are not intended to provide tax advice or financial planning with respect to every aspect of a client’s financial situation and do not include investments that clients may hold outside of Atomic Invest. For more details about Atomic Invest, please see the Form CRS, Form ADV Part 2A, the Privacy Policy, and other disclosures. Once you move forward with purchasing the policy, the insurer will dig deeper into who you are and look at things like your driving history and credit-based insurance score to calculate the actual price you will pay.

When the Copyright Directive was officially adopted, the new draft reflected the changes and concerns expressed by the general public. Additionally, a demonstration protesting draft Article 13 arranged in Cologne resulted in an X trend throughout Germany, as shown in the post below. One of the most active voices was Parliament member Axel Voss, who often took to X (called Twitter at the time) to defend the Directive, with such tweets as the one pictured below. Let’s examine how people responded to Article 13 before the draft was revised. Many people felt that Article 13 wouldn’t protect individuals but instead might silence them, unlike the GDPR and ePrivacy Regulation. Along with the ePrivacy Directive, people saw both as attempts to protect the public rather than corporate interests.

It's a section of the EU Copyright Directive that covers how online services should deal with high-value copyrighted content. It's been 18 years since the EU last looked at copyright and, of course, things have changed remarkably in that time. Copyright law allows for exemptions to be made in cases of parody or educational purposes.

Almost 400,000 people have so far signed a Change.org petition against the provision. The concerns about Article 13 are wide-ranging, including unease about the cost of compliance for smaller companies, and out-and-out censorship of the internet. Those votes happened just weeks after Europe's last big piece of internet-related legislation -- the General Data Privacy Regulation ( GDPR) -- kicked in.

The law also intends to get these platforms to pay creators more for their content. Mary Honeyball, a British Labour MEP who supports Article 13, says. "The text only requires that platforms either license or remove copyrighted material."

I really dread customer service phone calls, so I sometimes end up procrastinating pepperstone forex instead of taking action on important to-dos. The good news is you can compare auto insurance rates online and even get quotes from insurers without picking up the phone. This way you can make sure you're getting the best deal for your coverage without being put on hold.